This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: New approach to --with-cpu, take 4

At Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:17:46 +0000 (UTC), "Daniel Jacobowitz" wrote:
> I agree that that would be logical.  But check what the compiler actually
> _does_.

Well, to be fair, the example I was pointing at was the assembler.

I was under the mistaken impression that the compiler and the
assembler would work similarly.  (i dunno, in retrospect, why i would
have thought that!  8-)


> The check (to match compiler behavior, again) should really be "the
> last -mips option is -mips16".  That's why the comment said it wasn't
> quite right.

yeah.  for the compiler, it really is "last -mipsN option wins."


i suspect if you give -mipsN w/ -mips16, the result ... may not be
pretty...


cgd
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]