This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [g++] set __GXX_ABI_VERSION__ to 102

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 00:29:59 +0100
Subject: Re: [g++] set __GXX_ABI_VERSION__ to 102
References: <200208011954.g71JsRg01824@waller.constant.com> <200208020048.08628@enzo.bigblue.local> <20020801225353.GA12204@daikokuya.co.uk> <200208020128.34334@enzo.bigblue.local>

Franz Sirl wrote:-

> OK to commit?

Sure; I think we can agree it's obvious 8-)

> I think the point to disable all GCC signatures from the defines, while 
> keeping the ones common across different compilers. I guess it's useful for 
> people to test if the !GCC case still compiles?

Maybe.  I'll come back to this soon, as I want to get those defines into
c-common.c (it'll also stop one of the ">509 byte string" warnings.  Now
there's an incentive 8-)).  It might mean the driver passing -no-gcc on
to the front ends, but that's fine.

Neil.

References:
- [g++] set __GXX_ABI_VERSION__ to 102
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [g++] set __GXX_ABI_VERSION__ to 102
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: [g++] set __GXX_ABI_VERSION__ to 102
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: [g++] set __GXX_ABI_VERSION__ to 102
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]