This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: New approach to --with-cpu
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 11:56:17 +0100
- Subject: Re: RFC: New approach to --with-cpu
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> > +#ifdef TARGET_DEFAULT_OPTION_CPU
> > + if (TARGET_DEFAULT_CPU_P ())
> > + add_option (argcp, argvp, "-mcpu=" XSTRING (TARGET_DEFAULT_OPTION_CPU));
> > +#endif
>
> Sorry, didn't notice first time. Is it OK to use string
> concatenation in gcc.c?
No, I don't think so. It isn't available (that way) in K+R C.
R.