This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RF[DA]: fix execute/931004-10.c regressions


On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 08:50:13PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Before your change to set_mem_attributes on Sunday, the alignment according
> to MEM_ALIGN was that of the component, x[1], i.e. 16.  Now it is that of
> the underlying object, x, i.e. 64.

Really?  That shouldn't have changed.  I'll look into it.

> We don't have any documentation that spells out what MEM_ALIGN actually
> means.

It's the alignment of the MEM, not the MEM_EXPR, or MEM_OFFSET or
whatever.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]