This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Kill some dead code

From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
Date: 30 May 2002 15:37:48 -0700
Subject: Re: Kill some dead code
References: <20020530.031405.81713110.davem@redhat.com><20020530121818.C5313@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:14:05AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Well, that scheme conflicted with GC allocation so the optimization
> > was deleted but not the data structures that were used to implement it.
> 
> It doesn't actually conflict.  See the GC mark routine used
> for unused_insn_list in lists.c.

Or the 'GTY((deletable))' stuff on the PCH branch, which replaces it.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> <geoffk@redhat.com>

References:
- Kill some dead code
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: Kill some dead code
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]