This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: x86 stack frame padding

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 08:33:33 +0200
Subject: Re: x86 stack frame padding
References: <20020528133142.A14411@redhat.com> <20020529105441.GW6161@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020529105759.G4168@redhat.com>

> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:54:41PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Will this work for alloca blocks?
> 
> I'm pretty sure that alloca does its own forced alignment.
> (Checks).  Oops, no, it doesn't.  Grr.  Ok will fix.

It does only when the BIGGEST_ALIGNEMNT > PREFFERED_STACK_ALIGNMENT or
somthing like that.  Definitly not by default on i386.

Honza
> 
> 
> r~

References:
- x86 stack frame padding
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: x86 stack frame padding
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: x86 stack frame padding
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]