This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6660


> I agree that this results in declarations that look funny, but it
> could be hard to explain to some users why we allow one but not the
> other.

I agree that this:

  An anonymous member may be a struct or union.

is cleaner than this:

  An anonymous member may be a struct or union, except for typedef'd
  structs and unions, and you have to use only this syntax...
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]