This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ia64 tls support


On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 01:54:33PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I see that it does not scale very well for large programs, having 3MBs
> per thread overhead for GCC, for Mozilla it can be even more.  What I
> was thinking about is to create just pointer per function and allocate
> table when function is invoked first time.  Then the static overhead
> will be number_of_function*4 that should be considerably fewer + one
> conditional in function profile + function call at cold path.
> 
> Does this sound sane?

Not really.  I don't see how you're going to coordinate the threads.

> Concerning the second alternative - having atomic/thread safe increments
> on counters, can you show me example how this can be done on i386?

	lock addl $1, mem
	lock adcl $0, mem+4

Recall that you don't care about having the entire 64-bit result
stable until the end of the program.  It's just that you don't
want to lose any increments.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]