Re: 31 GCC regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2002-05-22T05:55:52Z.

[Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>]

GCC regression checker wrote:-

> With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> used to pass.  There are 4 new failures, and 27
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
> 
> The new failures are:
> powerpc-eabisim objc.sum objc.dg/const-str-2.m
> mips-elf objc.sum objc.dg/const-str-2.m
> native gdb.sum gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp:
> native objc.sum objc.dg/const-str-2.m

This fixes the objc failures (I have no idea at all what the
debug failure is.  If it's my patch I guess it's the same kind
of thing).  My patch causes the compiler to stop compiling if
there are any errors by the time the command line options have
been parsed.  This test seems to test for a command-line error,
but to have needed to catch some other random issue that used
to happen too.

OK Stan?

Neil.

testsuite:
	* objc.dg/const-str-2.m: Update now that we stop after
	a command line error.

Index: objc.dg/const-str-2.m
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/const-str-2.m,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 const-str-2.m
--- objc.dg/const-str-2.m	7 Feb 2002 09:08:25 -0000	1.2
+++ objc.dg/const-str-2.m	22 May 2002 22:47:08 -0000
@@ -3,8 +3,3 @@
 /* { dg-options "-fconstant-string-class" } */
 
 { dg-error "no class name specified as argument to -fconstant-string-class" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }
-
-void foo () {}
-
-/* Seem bogus, should investigate some day.  */
-/* { dg-error "parse error" "" { target *-*-* } 5 } */