This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in libiberty/configure.in

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: schwab at suse dot de
Cc: rl at cs dot tu-berlin dot de, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 16:45:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in libiberty/configure.in
References: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10205221800210.12884-100000@sossusvlei> <je7klvudd2.fsf@sykes.suse.de>


> The types "int (*)[]" and "int *" are not compatible,

Except that the address of an array points to an int, not to another
pointer, so "v" and "&v" are semantically identical.  They seem
technically compatible to me.

[not that I'm against the patch, since the new way is "more obviously
correct", but just curious]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in libiberty/configure.in
  - From: Andreas Schwab

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in libiberty/configure.in
  - From: Roman Lechtchinsky
- Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in libiberty/configure.in
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]