This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] __attribute__((nonnull))

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:46:29PM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

 > I think this message is too specific for the case of an operand number
 > that is <= 0 or greater than the number of function parameters, implying
 > that the parameter is present but of a bad type.  In such a case the
 > "invalid operand number" message would be better.

Ok, I can fix that.  (I actually did that in my original patch, but
the error was reported incorrectly if the operand number was +1 the
number of operands, because of how the tree list is terminated ... So
I simply changed it to work like the format attribute worked.)

Does the patch look okay other than that?

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]