This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Basic block renumbering removal
- From: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-pdo at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 21:41:02 +0200
- Subject: Re: Basic block renumbering removal
- References: <20020429151942.D11370@redhat.com> <20020430160511.GK18000@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020430163200.A3211@redhat.com> <20020514091823.GN6514@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020514172803.GC1535@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020515072607.GH4292@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020515151110.GA24680@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020515162535.D25141@redhat.com> <20020516062436.GA1786@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020516103755.B25733@redhat.com>
Hello.
> Since I don't want to read through a patch of this size again,
> and none of the points above is critical to correctness, I've
> committed the patch as-is.
Sorry; I haven't tried to compile objc. I've seen the problem before (iterative
dataflow does not have to terminate for some initial solutions, but without my
patch gcc somehow (not quite sure how) avoids them), but I hoped I fixed it
already). I will try to fix it asap, but it might be better to revert the
patch for now.
Zdenek