This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: perl@16573
- From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi at iki dot fi>
- To: "H.Merijn Brand" <h dot m dot brand at hccnet dot nl>
- Cc: Perl 5 Porters <perl5-porters at perl dot org>, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 03:18:03 +0300
- Subject: Re: perl@16573
- References: <20020513182017.E8867@alpha.hut.fi> <20020513172423.551F.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl> <20020513182617.5525.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl>
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 06:30:35PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Mon 13 May 2002 17:25, "H.Merijn Brand" <h.m.brand@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> > > Nice:
> > >
> > > - gcc 3.0 vs 64-bit hpux hints [Merijn]
> >
> > I can reproduce it, and it is in investigation mode :)
> > Expect something soon
>
> Hmmm, the problem was just a little more complicated
>
> a5:/pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-current 136 > gcc --version
> 3.0.4
> a5:/pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-current 137 > gcc64 --version
> gcc64 (GCC) 3.1 20020506 (prerelease)
> Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>
> a5:/pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-current 138 >
>
>
> For the moment, patch below works for 3.0.x and 3.1, but I guess we need more
> protective measures if the GNU people are realy going to change the version
> reports
Thanks, applied.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen