This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] checking version of rtl flag access macros

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 10:31:41 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checking version of rtl flag access macros
References: <20020506133908.A6122@us.ibm.com> <20020506144531.B13494@redhat.com> <wvnn0vc0xg2.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 04:50:05PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>   /* If RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P is set on a PARALLEL, process each member of
>      the PARALLEL independently. The first element is always processed if
>      it is a SET. This is for backward compatibility.   Other elements
>      are processed only if they are SETs and the RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P
>      flag is set in them.  */

What a curious notion.  I bet we can nuke this and always
process all of the members of the PARALLEL.  If there are
cases where we really want to ignore parts, then the target
can use REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR.

r~

References:
- [PATCH] checking version of rtl flag access macros
  - From: Janis Johnson
- Re: [PATCH] checking version of rtl flag access macros
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] checking version of rtl flag access macros
  - From: Richard Sandiford

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]