This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Ada vs WIDEST_HARDWARE_FP_SIZE
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:14:30PM -0400, Geert Bosch wrote:
> I'd like to give some backgrounds on the issue here. Some platforms
> define a "long double" which is wider than the widest type supported
> by hardware.
In which case, there are several ports missing this. Plus, the
sparc definition should depend on TARGET_HARD_QUAD, since that
asserts that the 128-bit instructions are present.