This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ada vs WIDEST_HARDWARE_FP_SIZE

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Geert Bosch <bosch at gnat dot com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>, jakub at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 13:17:28 -0700
Subject: Re: Ada vs WIDEST_HARDWARE_FP_SIZE
References: <20020502125905.A4944@redhat.com> <3B342216-5EB9-11D6-974A-00039344BF4A@gnat.com>

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:14:30PM -0400, Geert Bosch wrote:
> I'd like to give some backgrounds on the issue here. Some platforms
> define a "long double" which is wider than the widest type supported
> by hardware.

In which case, there are several ports missing this.  Plus, the
sparc definition should depend on TARGET_HARD_QUAD, since that
asserts that the 128-bit instructions are present.

r~

References:
- Ada vs WIDEST_HARDWARE_FP_SIZE
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Ada vs WIDEST_HARDWARE_FP_SIZE
  - From: Geert Bosch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]