This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: altivec: switch to disable VRSAVE generation
- From: Daniel Egger <degger at fhm dot edu>
- To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>,GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 02 May 2002 02:41:47 +0200
- Subject: Re: altivec: switch to disable VRSAVE generation
- References: <20020430050440.GA12660@redhat.com><200204301634.MAA28108@makai.watson.ibm.com><20020501001220.GB14326@redhat.com><371060000.1020217912@gandalf.codesourcery.com><20020501020718.GA14299@redhat.com><1020258294.28608.8.camel@sonja.de.interearth.com> <20020502000718.GB15468@redhat.com>
Am Don, 2002-05-02 um 02.07 schrieb Aldy Hernandez:
> yup, but there's still a few buglets lying around by running without
> the altivec abi.
Not that I knew. As far as I can tell everything works fine when not
using features like vector arguments and alike even without
-mabi=altivec. All of the source I maintain works equally with or
without and that's probably what 99,5% of the users will also see;
at least I haven't found a sensible use for vector arguments and
return values yet.
--
Servus,
Daniel