This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: underlying type of C++ enums [changes ABI, ok for 3.1?]

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:50:01 -0700
Subject: Re: underlying type of C++ enums [changes ABI, ok for 3.1?]
References: <org01jtp31.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><wvl1yd3qtlg.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><or662ftj36.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><wvlk7qvp73q.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><ory9fbqjwa.fsf_-_@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><wvlelh2q1kc.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><ork7qu8bnz.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><or1yd2870n.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>


> Mark, your call.

OK, go with the patch that Jason approved.  Let's hope we were too paranoid
before.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: underlying type of C++ enums [changes ABI, ok for 3.1?]
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- underlying type of C++ enums
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: underlying type of C++ enums
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: underlying type of C++ enums
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: underlying type of C++ enums
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: underlying type of C++ enums [changes ABI, ok for 3.1?]
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: underlying type of C++ enums [changes ABI, ok for 3.1?]
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: underlying type of C++ enums [changes ABI, ok for 3.1?]
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: underlying type of C++ enums [changes ABI, ok for 3.1?]
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]