This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
- From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
- To: jakub at redhat dot com
- Cc: pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at, tromey at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 15:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0204092349010.77007-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><20020409.152213.57844397.davem@redhat.com><20020410004308.B32482@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:43:08 +0200
So shouldn't we avoid building 64-bit libs if kernel can't run them?
I agree, because if we can't multilib to build the 64-bit support
libraries, even if the user goes to a 64-bit capable kernel the
compiler won't be able to build anything.
2002-04-10 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/6237
My gut insticnt tells me to approve this, but only for the 3.1 branch.
We should really make multilibbing work in this case I think.
Richard?