This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:28:04 -0800
Subject: Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]
References: <20020325004601.A14556@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203251027300.10497-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 10:34:24AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> That sounds like "const" and "pure" attributes are being specified at the
> wrong level - in terms of program transformations, rather than in terms of
> properties of programs containing calls to such functions.

I don't disagree.  Nevertheless, that's the state of things.


r~

References:
- Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take 2]
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Patch to detect invalid and missing ATTRIBUTE const/pure [take2]
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]