This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: integrated -save-temps and the death of specs
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- To: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
- Cc: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>,Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 07:04:21 +0000
- Subject: Re: integrated -save-temps and the death of specs
- References: <3BBDF362-3B9B-11D6-AA0D-000393750C1E@redhat.com> <3C97E76C.D0AE29D@apple.com>
Stan Shebs wrote:-
> > i agree that we have to provide a mechanism for user configurability,
> > but not at the expense of unreadability. who can argue that the spec
> > file at the end of this message is readable, easy to update, and
> > debuggable? (that's just a random one picked).
>
> I must be an old fogey then - the spec string doesn't seem any
> worse than the C code. :-)
Just brainwashed 8-)
Neil.