This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: GEN_INT_MODE (1/~4)

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 05:10:14PM +0100, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> > + #define GEN_INT_MODE(N, MODE)  GEN_INT (trunc_int_for_mode ((N), (MODE)))
> I'd prefer this to be a function in emit-rtl.c, placed immediately
> after gen_rtx_CONST_INT.  There's no sense inlining two function
> calls like this.

I see that the definition of GEN_INT use a cast to avoid trouble when
gen_rtx_CONST_INT isn't prototyped.  So should GEN_INT_MODE be a
macro, with a corresponding cast, calling the new function?

-- 
Lars Brinkhoff          http://lars.nocrew.org/     Linux, GCC, PDP-10,
Brinkhoff Consulting    http://www.brinkhoff.se/    HTTP programming
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]