This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Possible C++ patch: mangling of 128-bit integers

From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 14 Mar 2002 09:09:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Possible C++ patch: mangling of 128-bit integers
References: <wvnzo1cvg7s.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com><20020313123905.A24532@redhat.com><or1yeonpwm.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20020313130346.B24545@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
> Doh.  Of course that's why TYPE_PRECISION is better.  If we've
> not checked earlier though, we may want to check TREE_CODE ==
> INTEGER_TYPE.

Just to confirm that this code's for INTEGER_TYPEs only.

Richard

References:
- Possible C++ patch: mangling of 128-bit integers
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: Possible C++ patch: mangling of 128-bit integers
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Possible C++ patch: mangling of 128-bit integers
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Possible C++ patch: mangling of 128-bit integers
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]