This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] 3 tiny mklibgcc.in fixes
- From: cgd at broadcom dot com
- To: "Jakub Jelinek" <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Richard Henderson" <rth at redhat dot com>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 05 Mar 2002 08:02:38 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] 3 tiny mklibgcc.in fixes
- References: <20020305121920.S2204@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><mailpost.1015327275.28081@news-sj1-1>
At Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:21:15 +0000 (UTC), "Jakub Jelinek" wrote:
> + echo ' @$(NM_FOR_TARGET) '${SHLIB_NM_FLAGS} ${o}' | $(AWK) '\''NF == 3 { print "\t.hidden", $$3 }'\'' | $(GCC_FOR_TARGET) $(LIBGCC2_CFLAGS) '${flags}' -r -nostdinc -nostdlib -o $@ '${o}' -xassembler -'
^
^
Is there really a strong reason to persist in hiding this output when
libgcc is being built?
cgd