This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: fix kennerism
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 01 14:21:11 EST
- Subject: Re: fix kennerism
Or if "make check" was run, the results weren't examined.
I saw failures, but they looked pre-existing to me. I really have to figure
out why I have failures that other systems don't seem to have: it makes it
much harder to spot the real ones. But I thought we don't use integrate.c
for C anymore and instead use the tree inliner? That belief was part of
the reason I thought the errors were unrelated.
The issue is that if the old and new address are the same
replace_equiv_address_nv will return the original MEM.