This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Re: scheduling vs lexical scopes

On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:00:58PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> This is one of manifestation of bugs in the cfglayout notes.  WHat do
> you think about my new code (at cfg branch) that does handle sope notes
> at insn basis?

Seems mostly ok.  I don't see the need to construct a scope tree.
Such already exists at DECL_INITIAL (cfun->decl).  All you need is
to (ab)use BLOCK_NUMBER to record the block levels, so that you 
can reemit the notes.  Which should be just fine, since BLOCK_NUMBER
isn't used until final.

> (but it will cause many fragments to be created)

I do worry about this, particularly for non-dwarf3 debug targets.
Not sure what to do about it though.


r~
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]