This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Volatile MEMs in statement expressions and functions inlined as trees

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at transmeta dot com>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gdr at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:15:19 -0800
Subject: Re: Volatile MEMs in statement expressions and functions inlined as trees
References: <ord71jawz6.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112130915480.1700-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>

On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:35:08AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But Jason is, I think, really trying to argue for the opposite, namely
> that if you don't use the value of an lvalue, it doesn't get dereferenced.

You've completely ignored the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion
part of Jason's argument.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Volatile MEMs in statement expressions and functions inlined astrees
  - From: Linus Torvalds

References:
- Re: Volatile MEMs in statement expressions and functions inlined as trees
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Volatile MEMs in statement expressions and functions inlined as trees
  - From: Linus Torvalds

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]