This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [cfg-branch] improved Software Trace Cache
> > > > Looking at the code, the size < 8 * uncond_jump_length needs to be placed
> > > > somewhere here to avoid accepting of arbitary huge blocks.
> > >
> > > I thought we could duplicate large BB too if it is worth. It seems not to be a good idea because the code could grow too much.
> > I guess it is not worthwhile - if you duplicate small BB you may save
> > considerable portion of time, if you duplicate large BB, the cost of branch
> > saved is tiny compared to the block itself.
> Now we are not duplicating large blocks.
I again forgot to write that it is bootstrapped on i386.