Re: RFA: Further C / ObjC initialization cleanup

[Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>]

Joseph S. Myers wrote:

>On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Neil Booth wrote:
>
>>2) Since that creates more common code between C and ObjC, I've
>>   created c-objc-common.c and moved it from c-lang.c to there
>>
>
>You failed to update doc/passes.texi.  (That file also ought to have been
>updated when c-dump.c and c-dump.h were renamed.)
>

OK, thanks for pointing that out. I checked in the following.

regards

Bryce.




2001-11-28  Bryce McKinlay  <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>

	* doc/passes.texi: Remove reference to c-dump.c. Update tree inlining
	doc.

Index: passes.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/doc/passes.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 passes.texi
--- passes.texi	2001/11/27 22:31:32	1.2
+++ passes.texi	2001/11/28 00:42:49
@@ -112,7 +112,6 @@
 The files
 @file{c-common.c},
 @file{c-common.def},
-@file{c-dump.c},
 @file{c-format.c},
 @file{c-pragma.c},
 @file{c-semantics.c},
@@ -135,11 +134,10 @@
 @cindex inline on trees, automatic
 Currently, the main optimization performed here is tree-based
 inlining.
-This is implemented for C++ in @file{cp/optimize.c}.  Note that
-tree based inlining turns off rtx based inlining (since it's more
+This is implemented in @file{tree-inline.c} and used by both C and C++.  
+Note that tree based inlining turns off rtx based inlining (since it's more
 powerful, it would be a waste of time to do rtx based inlining in
 addition).
-The C front end currently does not perform tree based inlining.
 
 @cindex constant folding
 @cindex arithmetic simplifications