This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Arranging for -Os to imply -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on x86

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Arranging for -Os to imply -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on x86
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 24 Oct 2001 18:15:24 -0200
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <ork7xmbrxp.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20011024105649.C20132@redhat.com>

On Oct 24, 2001, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:

> I'd rather detect the required alignment of a function than use
> an attribute.

This wouldn't work in case of separate compilation.  Admittedly, I
hadn't even considered that case when I posted my suggestion, but
Jan's message made me think of it.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Arranging for -Os to imply -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on x86
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Arranging for -Os to imply -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on x86
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Arranging for -Os to imply -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 on x86
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]