This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Pragma handling: non-C front ends should not require c_lex()

To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Subject: Re: Pragma handling: non-C front ends should not require c_lex()
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:24:13 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20011015232258.A21596@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20011016135603.B12486@redhat.com> <20011016220624.A14770@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>

On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 10:06:24PM +0100, Neil Booth wrote:
> That leaves c4x and i370.  Would you accept a patch to have those
> targets use c{,xx}_target_objs with their pragma routines bropken out
> into a separate file?

Certainly.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pragma handling: non-C front ends should not require c_lex()
  - From: Neil Booth

References:
- Pragma handling: non-C front ends should not require c_lex()
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Pragma handling: non-C front ends should not require c_lex()
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Pragma handling: non-C front ends should not require c_lex()
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]