This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: c tree inlining vs dwarf2

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: c tree inlining vs dwarf2
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 16 Oct 2001 19:19:46 -0200
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <20011008094151.A30162@redhat.com><orpu7w57b6.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20011010095122.B7976@redhat.com>

On Oct 10, 2001, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 03:37:49AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> * tree-inline.c (inlinable_function_p): Leave it up to the
>> front-end to turn -finline-functions into DECL_INLINE set for all
>> functions.

> Ok.

Thanks, I've finally checked this in.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

References:
- c tree inlining vs dwarf2
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: c tree inlining vs dwarf2
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: c tree inlining vs dwarf2
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]