This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [C++] Unreviewed patches

To: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <lerdsuwa at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Subject: Re: [C++] Unreviewed patches
From: Jason Merrill <jason_merrill at redhat dot com>
Date: 15 Oct 2001 07:29:33 +0100
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <3BC83B1D.6CBEA036@users.sourceforge.net><3BC70789.B62B62D6@users.sourceforge.net><m3itdksor7.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><3BC83B1D.6CBEA036@users.sourceforge.net><4.3.2.7.0.20011014150944.00af2d40@mozart.inet.co.th>

>>>>> "Kriang" == Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

>> Yes.  So will you make the same change for TYPENAME_TYPE?

> Sure.  The fix for TYPENAME_TYPE (a change to the definition
> of TYPENAME_TYPE_FULLNAME, and setup TYPE_BINFO in
> cp_make_lang_type) is already included the patch.

Why, so it is.  I'm not sure what I was thinking.  OK.

Jason

References:
- Re: [C++] Unreviewed patches
  - From: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
- [C++] Unreviewed patches
  - From: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
- Re: [C++] Unreviewed patches
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++] Unreviewed patches
  - From: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]