This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Loop unroll fixes
- To: mark at codesourcery dot com (Mark Mitchell)
- Subject: Re: Loop unroll fixes
- From: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli at hzoli dot 2y dot net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:58:47 -0500 (CDT)
- Cc: dje at watson dot ibm dot com, wilson at cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,bernds at redhhat dot com, Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com
h> I am still committed to reviewing these patches, but only after you
> confirm that they pass regression tests. Please send me email when
My first patch, that largish patch to doloop.c, together with the
patch described at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-09/msg00596.html is identical
to the patches I and David posted before, and it did pass all
regressions before, it just haven't run with the lates CVS version.
It's is being used by several people, and I do not know about any
issues. The second patch-set is new, I am not that confident about
those, but I'll run the regressions.
> Also, I don't think we can consider these patches for 3.0.2 at this
> point. They will have to wait for 3.0.3 -- unless the regressions
> you describe have been introduced *after* GCC 3.0, i.e., unless
> the tests passed in GCC 3.0. Did they?
No, all of these were broken in 3.0 already.
Zoli