This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: dwarf2 bug. Was Re: reorder bug in 3.0
- To: Andrew Macleod <amacleod at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: dwarf2 bug. Was Re: reorder bug in 3.0
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:56:38 -0700
- Cc: dan at cgsoftware dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, schwab at suse dot de
- References: <200110101500.IAA22985@rtl.cygnus.com>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:00:07AM -0700, Andrew Macleod wrote:
> When the outer function is being processed, the nested function is not
> referenced in either the BLOCK_VARS or BLOCK_SUBBLOCKS lists, so it
> never gets its parent field set.
Hmm. I wonder if the original BLOCK that did contain the
nested function was removed due to being empty.
Look for the thing before the calls to remove_unnecessary_notes.
r~