This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

lang_hooks (was Re: Tree inlining...)

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: lang_hooks (was Re: Tree inlining...)
From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 00:17:31 -0700
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20011002224005.A23159@redhat.com> <oradz92p5k.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:50:15AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Besides, I don't like lang_hooks much because the initializers are
> ordered, not named, which may lead to synchronization difficulties
> and warnings about missing initializers, especially for languages
> maintained outside the GCC CVS tree.

Maybe we want to do something with lang_hooks like what Neil did with
target.h?  This could address both problems at once.

zw

References:
- Re: Tree inlining for the C front end (part 1 of 3)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Tree inlining for the C front end (part 1 of 3)
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]