This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Integer constant parsing overhaul

To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
Subject: Re: Integer constant parsing overhaul
From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 18:41:38 +0100
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk
References: <20010823005152.A22802@panix.com> <20010823183916.A24428@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>

I wrote:-

> How about scrapping this last if statement and its block, and putting
> something like the following in the switch?
> 
>        case 'l': case 'L':
> 	 if (l++ && s[n - 1] != s[n - 2])
> 	   return 0;
> 	 break;

Agh!  I got the sense of the loop wrong, it should be

 	 if (l++ && s[n - 1] != s[n])

I think.

Neil.

References:
- Integer constant parsing overhaul
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Integer constant parsing overhaul
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]