This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: std_limits.h os_defines.h
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: std_limits.h os_defines.h
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 14:26:45 -0700
- cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
--On Thursday, August 09, 2001 05:08:20 PM -0400 David Edelsohn
<dje@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Benjamin Kosnik writes:
>
> Ben> I think this patch is pretty weak. Some of the targets use LONG_MAX,
> some Ben> use stuff like __alpha, etc. I don't see any reason to not use
> LONG_MAX, Ben> as was discussed.
I think the scheme that we are planning on using is robust enough
for now and it solves a very important problem: making cross-compilation,
and multilibs, work correctly. Since I thought you agreed, I decided
to go this way in 3.0.1.
Doing something better in 3.1 is great.
Do you have time to look at the problem Gerald reported with colons
in path names that is apparently triggered by the staging headers
work? That is one of the few regressions from 3.0, and we definitely
need a solution.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com