This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patches] Re: More curefull aligning of branches

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: [patches] Re: More curefull aligning of branches
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 14:17:44 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, patches at x86-64 dot org
References: <20010727155610.F19763@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010727175530.D29195@redhat.com> <20010728205352.I25604@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010728140928.B29975@redhat.com> <20010728231153.W25604@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 11:11:53PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> What about the semantic of abnormal edges?  Shouls I count each
> abnormal edge as an indirect jump?

Yes.  We can't have gotten there otherwise, can we.  But careful
about jump classification -- switches are not abnormal, but are
still indirect.

r~

References:
- More curefull aligning of branches
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: More curefull aligning of branches
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: More curefull aligning of branches
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: More curefull aligning of branches
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [patches] Re: More curefull aligning of branches
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]