This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor

To: tromey at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 22 Jul 2001 18:54:15 -0300
Cc: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10107120951120.1741-100000@mars.deadcafe.org><87lmlnhxyj.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <opofqjysxo.fsf@fencer.cygnus.com><orelr8r8hd.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><87r8v87imp.fsf@creche.redhat.com>

On Jul 22, 2001, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:

> Maybe you mean just in the case where a developer is doing everything
> by hand.

Yep.

> He would "know" that he doesn't have to rebuild the derived files.
> Does this case matter?

Well, probably not much.  Especially after we start actually doing
inter-class inlining...  Never mind my objection.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

References:
- PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]