This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patches] Re: gcc 3.1 ICE in make_label_edge on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20--bootstrap fails

To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Subject: Re: [patches] Re: gcc 3.1 ICE in make_label_edge on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20--bootstrap fails
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:22:29 -0700
Cc: John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, patches at x86-64 dot org
References: <20010717191002.E2867@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200107181927.f6IJRNlD012402@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <20010719161405.C6619@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010719091649.I1931@redhat.com> <20010719181813.P6619@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 06:18:13PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Won't this create the chained barriers then?

Hum?  Oh, you mean something that verify_flow_info would
complain about.  Hmm..

Oh, actually the reason that you can't delete the barrier
is that it's still in use.  By the jump (or noreturn call)
that we replaced the RESX with.

Why don't we just delete the RESX there where the comment
currently is?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patches] Re: gcc 3.1 ICE in make_label_edge on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20--bootstrap fails
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: gcc 3.1 ICE in make_label_edge on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20--bootstrap fails
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: gcc 3.1 ICE in make_label_edge on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20--bootstrap fails
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [patches] Re: gcc 3.1 ICE in make_label_edge on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20--bootstrap fails
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]