This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor

To: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 18:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10107120951120.1741-100000@mars.deadcafe.org><87lmlnhxyj.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
Reply-To: apbianco at cygnus dot com

Tom Tromey writes:

> Is it hard to do this in a general way?  If the superclass is
> derived from Object and it doesn't need a constructor, then
> eliminate more calls?  (i.e., work recursively)

Yeah.

> In case you're interested...

I looked around but couldn't find the thread. Do you have any
pointers? I'd like to file a PR.

./A

References:
- PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]