This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [v3] new staging headers
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
- Subject: Re: [v3] new staging headers
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:08:07 -0400
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdr at codesourcery dot com, bkoz at redhat dot com
- References: <20010713125559.A31222@disaster.jaj.com> <email@example.com>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 09:40:53PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> | One additional note: Gaby, the change of yours from three days ago regarding
> | expf and atan2f didn't get run through autoheader to rebuild config.h.in
> | and the two HAVE_ symbols.
> Hmm, I want configure to continue to test for the existence of those
> symbols and define the appropriate macros.
Ah. In that case, removing them altogether from the AC_* world on Tuesday
was probably wrong; now they're not being tested for at all, which is why
autoheader insists on removing the symbols from config.h.in.
Maybe use AC_CHECK_FUNCS instead of AC_REPLACE_MATHFUNCS? That way the
checks will be done, and the HAVE_* symbols defined, but the functions
won't appear in the LIBMATHOBJS variable.
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC