This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: system include directories
- To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: system include directories
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 08:08:12 -0700
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, mark <mark at codesourcery dot com>
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:16:48PM +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> > Don't need _() here. In fact, you shouldn't need any of them, I think
> > gettext has the brains to extract the other strings despite their
> > being inside a ?: expression. Take them all out, regenerate gcc.pot,
> > and see if any of the strings are missing.
> I agree the _() shouldn't be needed. Regenerating gcc.pot I find that
> there are no strings for any cpp_warning call. This looks
> like a separate issue.
Yes.
> Is this one good enough? I've added in your wording to invoke.texi, and
> added some words to cpp.texi. No need to put in the gcc version --
> just keep the docs with the source.
This one looks good to me.
--
zw One can't, of course, perform Kaspar Hauser experiments on the
offspring of one's conspecifics.
-- Jerry Fodor, _The Mind Doesn't Work That Way_