This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: system include directories
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>
- Subject: Re: system include directories
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 14:16:48 +0100
- CC: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, mark <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Organization: Codesourcery LLC
- References: <20010701144501.G18369@stanford.edu>
Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Don't need _() here. In fact, you shouldn't need any of them, I think
> gettext has the brains to extract the other strings despite their
> being inside a ?: expression. Take them all out, regenerate gcc.pot,
> and see if any of the strings are missing.
I agree the _() shouldn't be needed. Regenerating gcc.pot I find that
there are no strings for any cpp_warning call. This looks
like a separate issue.
Is this one good enough? I've added in your wording to invoke.texi, and
added some words to cpp.texi. No need to put in the gcc version --
just keep the docs with the source.
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
include-3.patch