This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [C++ patch]: reorganize tree inlining

To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: [C++ patch]: reorganize tree inlining
From: Jason Merrill <jason_merrill at redhat dot com>
Date: 02 Jul 2001 14:13:02 +0100
Cc: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
References: <3B3F81B7.5727694C@codesourcery.com><20010702124801.A11282@murlibobo.cs.mu.OZ.AU><3B406AED.39469753@codesourcery.com>

>>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes:

> It occurs to me that separate dumps for each phase might not be sensible
> (especially as each optimization might be applied more than once).

How is this any different from the current RTL dumps?  We already have two
cse dumps, and this doesn't cause trouble.

> 	-fdump-ast-all
> Do all ast optimization dumps.

Any reason not to include this in -da?

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ patch]: reorganize tree inlining
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

References:
- [C++ patch]: reorganize tree inlining
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [C++ patch]: reorganize tree inlining
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: [C++ patch]: reorganize tree inlining
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]