This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: More cpp.texi updates
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: More cpp.texi updates
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 22:44:06 -0700
- cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw at stanford dot edu>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
--On Sunday, July 01, 2001 03:04:05 PM +0200 Gerald Pfeifer
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Neil Booth wrote:
>> Should we keep regenerating the man pages on mainline, or do we only
>> do that for a release?
> My feeling is that, if we have a generated file in our CVS repository,
> it should be up-to-date all of the time.
I agree. Also, I think that we should make this statement false
by making the antecedent false for virtuall all files. I could
even see getting rid of `configure' (shoot me, so there), but
definitely the man pages. Kill 'em. Patch pre-approved.
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com