This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Some syntactic sugar for machine descriptions
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>
- Subject: Re: Some syntactic sugar for machine descriptions
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:32:26 -0700
- Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010628180508.A16763@redhat.com> <20010628181524.L432@stanford.edu>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:15:25PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > Pretty sure you want a return here. We're not supposed
> > to put the newline on the obstack, are we?
>
> The old code did.
True, it does. But archaeology suggests that was by oversight rather
than by intention. IMO we should either support \\\n as one might
expect -- line concatenation -- or not support it at all.
The patch is ok with that change.
r~