This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: templated cmath function instantiation
- To: Kurt Garloff <garloff at suse dot de>
- Subject: Re: templated cmath function instantiation
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:36:01 -0400
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <flr8wcc8vb.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010625110457.A30639@disaster.jaj.com> <flvglk306e.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010625132346.A31568@disaster.jaj.com> <fl66dk2ukg.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010625150540.A32484@disaster.jaj.com> <fl1yo82tgb.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010625155056.A363@disaster.jaj.com> <20010626124918.B4346@garloff.etpnet.phys.tue.nl> <20010626141848.A6237@garloff.etpnet.phys.tue.nl>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 02:18:48PM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> It's fixed. You can close the PR.
Thanks!
> Remark:
> I had to manually run configure in the i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3 subdir
> to pick up the cmath ... Just running in the build dir apparently was not
> enough :-(
> (Maybe that's to be expected, I unfortunately don't know the autoXXXX tools
> well enough.)
It's expected, but not the autotools' problem. Rather it's just a
side-effect of the way the target libraries are built. Their configure
scripts are not run at the same time the main configure's are; the
libraries are configured and built at the end of the 'make' / 'make
bootstrap' invocation.
Phil
--
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC