This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Final PATCH for Re: IMPORTANT 3.0 PATCH: gcc_release
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Final PATCH for Re: IMPORTANT 3.0 PATCH: gcc_release
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:53:53 -0700
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 08:07:46PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2001, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> >> It's like the bison-generated parsers: not a problem to require the
> >> tools for users of CVS, but they need to be present in snapshots and
> >> releases.
>
> > Agreed. Since the release process now does a full build of the compiler,
> > if we do it this way we will automatically get the right stuff in the
> > release -- and not have to worry about keeping stuff in synch.
>
> With the current Makefiles (unless I've missed some patch for
> gcc/Makefile.in in the past 24 hours), you'll only get the man-pages
> updated if you *install* after the full build.
Yah. I was speaking in context of changes to be made in the future.
zw