This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: The remaining dubious symbols in libgcc-std.ver
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>
- Subject: Re: The remaining dubious symbols in libgcc-std.ver
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:18:29 -0700
- cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at science dot uva dot nl>, "rth at redhat dot com" <rth at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
--On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 07:01:04 PM -0700 Zack Weinberg
<zackw@Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 06:39:11PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> > I'll apply that change with the other libgcc.ver changes, which will
>> > mean another bootstrap cycle, so all of those changes will go in very
>> > late tonight.
>>
>> Thank you.
>
> The changes required to bump the soname were more invasive than I'd
> expected (insert rant about code duplication in t-fragments here), so
> if I could get another pair of eyes on this patch, please?
I worry that we are being too clever. Would you mind just doing a
lexical replacement of of `0' with `1' on the branch? The abstraction
you're going for is definitely goodness, and your patch is fine for
the mainline, but I'd be happier if we were just replacing `0' with `1'
on the branch.
Thank you for dealing with these bits,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com